On May 11, 2004 I wrote that Leadership could be defined by two characteristics: Leaders participate and Leaders take responsibility. These two characteristics, are foundational to the nature of a leader . . . and both can be learned. Participation is the will to become involved. The will to choose to enter into the task at hand. Leaders will participate. They choose to contribute their skills and abilities to the mission, even to the defining of that mission and the strategic planning AND EXECUTION of those plans. Leaders Participate by choice. For some that choice may seem to be a natural expression of their personality, however, anyone can choose to participate and discipline themselves to enter into the fray. Whether it is the discussion in a classroom, participation in a local church project, or heading up a major project at work - those who participate are more likely to become involved in the leadership of that activity than those who sit back and wait.

Along the same lines is taking responsibility. Let's face it - most of the world is looking for someone else to take responsibility. Not the leader. She is willing to accept the responsibility for the success or failure of a project because she knows the gifts and abilities she brings to the table and is confident in her ability to succeed. The willingness to take responsibility characterizes those who are unwilling to simply allow and accept mediocrity. When her world slows to a stagnant point this leader will take responsibility for her own actions and move forward to a better place and a better solution.

Of course this conversation leads us to observe that there ARE gifts and abilities which are also part of the Leaders quiver. This will be the subject of another post.