I had the privilege of leading a workshop on Teams for the Whitley County Leadership Academy on December 17.  The focus of the workshop was to examine the workings of teams from two different perspectives.  The first perspective was that of a team member.  We began the session with an exercise which involved the whole group in attempting to achieve a goal that required significant teamwork but provided little guidance on how to accomplish the goal and placed serious restrictions on the groups ability to work together.  Sounds a lot like real life, doesn't it.  Anyway through the group experience the the principles of how to work as a team the discussion provided some insight on what the group members were facing in their "real" world and we were able to work through some solutions.  The second perspective was that of the leader of a team.  In this part of the discussion the principles were similar but the focus on the responsibilities of the leader were emphasized.  I really do believe everything rises and falls on leadership and if I am the leader of the group, I carry significant responsibility to enable the group to be come a high performance team.  In the same vein, if I am a team member, I must still take leadership of myself and my part in the team goal to facilitate the possibility of a high functioning team.  When you are on a team, it is not about you - it is about working with the others to accomplish the goal.

I am reading a new book with the title "It." It is about that "something" you can sense in churches that exude life and how to find "IT." Still too early in the book to be able to say if it lives up to its goals. I am intrigued, however, because I have definitely been in a church with "IT" (Antioch Church in Wheaton, Il.) and some where "IT" was a distant memory. What makes the difference? Music, leadership, preaching, fellowship, facilities, doctrine, agenda, etc?
Rick Upchurch
Sent from my Windows Mobile® phone.

I conducted a weekend leadership development experience for Odon Church of the Nazarene, Odon, Indiana, on November 13,14, 2009. The sessions focused on defining leadership, along with identifying leadership characteristics and basic components, team skills, and the importance of understanding yourself and others using the Kiersey sorter.

This picture is from an exercise in team building using a rope and blind folds.

I have to commend the pastor, Trevor Stanley and the church leadership for opening themselves up to this kind of experience. Whenever we learn more about leadership, it begins to change us and the way we look at our world.

When presenting about change at regional workshops I have emphasized the point that no change occurs without some urgency. That is, without a sense of urgency, there is little motivation to change and rarely any long-term change. Twice I have been asked about the danger of alarming the congregation; of spreading wildfire.

On the one hand this is a valid concern as "wild" fire can have a tendency to burn out of control and destroy - something to definitely avoid.

On the other hand, unless the congregation takes their head out of the sand and realizes that there is a fire which has the potential bring death to the church, through stagnation if nothing else, there is little hope of bringing change.

So, the answer is, take the risk, take off the blinders and reveal the danger and allow/create/nurture a sense of urgency which can be used to motivate change.

I think most people feel they are pretty good communicators. I think most people consider themselves average or better in the leadership area. Let's assume for the sake of argument that both of these assumptions are accurate, that is, most people are pretty good communicators and average or better leaders.

If this is true, what can we deduce from the obvious evidence of our society?

• That there are relatively few divorces
• That most businesses thrive and grow
• That most investments succeed
• That we have efficient governmental structures/policies/procedures
• That integrity (a key part of leadership) is the cornerstone of all relationships - personal and business

What, you say there seems to be a disconnect? That these items in the list above are not true? Could it be that the premise upon which they were built has problems?

Solution: Quit thinking how wonderful you are and start learning how to do the right things - remember all of life can be reduced to relationships.

I have become convinced that leaders should take up the game of golf no matter how frustrating!! There is so much to be learned by chasing that little white ball:

• Pride in a stroke well hit
• Humility in a stroke no so well hit
• Focus - keeping your eye on the ball
• Focus - keeping your head down
• Focus - holding your club just right
• Focus - Holding your body just right
• Focus - swinging the club just right

Are you getting the sense that golf is an exercise in focus? I hope so. Of course, for me, humility is right up there as well. Leader's need ongoing reminders of the basics and focus is a biggie.

I am currently teaching a class on Contemporary Leadership as part of the curriculum for the EXCEL Adult Degree Program at Huntington University. The foundation upon which the course was written was Jim Collins' book Good to Great. I have written about this book in earlier posts so I won't go back into it, except to say this is a must read for anyone serious about leadership education.

I am finding, however, that taken alone, the principles from this book may be a little ahead of those who are being exposed to leadership for the first time. I can see in the students' eyes the interest in the material as well as some confusion as to how to wrap their minds around the material. So, I have had to augment the course with some more basic concepts which provide greater context for understanding the book. For example in the discussion of level 5 leaders, I spent quite some time working with Maxwell's levels of leadership and the section on credibility from The Leadership Challenge.

I don't think this is a comment on the students, but perhaps a thought that, while we all say "Leadership is in short supply," we might not know exactly what leadership really looks like when we see. It is easy to get taken in by those who fit the caricature rather than the individual who simply and quietly influences movement toward a goal.

Some of the KEY words which are associated with leadership include:

• Passion
• Vision
• Character
• Integrity
• Focus
• Risk taker
• Strategic thinker/planner
• Wise
• Communicator
• Executor
  

Have you ever seen pictures of what the walls of you home look like minus the drywall? About every 16" there is a 2"x4" piece of wood going from the floor to the ceiling. These are called studs. They are placed at this 16" interval for two reasons. First it allows for easier fitting of standardized insulation and other building materials, but more importantly it provides strength to support the roof. Spaced too far apart and the weight of the roof, particularly with the addition of snow would be too great and it would fall in.

In the same way, leaders have to be men or women who are multifaceted. A leader is not one thing but many things, and while it may be that one or two are part of the genetic heritage, most of what makes a leader comes through experience and education. Keep working on it - you'll get there.

I've just finished going through the book "Selling the Invisible" twice. Have given copies to key people at my work with instructions to cover the last half and be prepared to discuss sometime this week or next. The book is only partly about selling. It is mostly about leading your organization to be aware of who it is and what it's purpose is.

I have to believe if you are struggling to figure out where you are heading as an organization, or maybe you just need to do some evaluation this would probably be a good book for a leadership retreat.

For me one of the most significant points had to do with the discussion on Position and Position statements. Some of the quotes related to this are:

"Stand for one distinctive thing that will give you a competitive advantage." (p.103)
and
"To broaden your appeal, narrow your position." (p. 105)

I think this is especially hard for churches who want to be all things to all people and wind up doing most things with mediocrity, or worse. The information on focusing on one distinctive thing and how that actually can broaden your appeal is definitely a message the church needs to listen to. For example, Beckwith says "In positioning, don't try to hide your small size. Make it work by stressing its advantages, such as responsiveness and individual attention." (p.120)

If you are a leader in ANY organization this is a book worth having on your shelf.